Anti- Gun Liberal Gets PWNED

Jay Carney: ‘If One Child’s Life Can Be Saved, We Must Take Action’

Let's put that statement in context...

So if by saying "one child's life" he means do the same thing that has caused millions of men, women and children to die, then I'd say he's on the right track.

Democrats Like Americans the way Mass Murderers do - defenseless.

For people who have no idea what is going on, this video shows how these criminals in Washington have been dodging questions about their selling of guns to violent drug cartels. Guns which they now want banned for law abiding citizens.

Somehow, Eric Holder is not sitting in a jail cell. You know, Eric Holder, our Great Attorney General, appointed by Dear Leader, who was overseeing Operation Fast and Furious. This "Operation" told gun shop owners to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels while the Feds allowed the guns across the border without any tracking or monitoring.

But what did Obama do when an American border agent, Brian Terry, was murdered? Was he outraged? Did he go after the drug cartels? What did Obama do when Holder was asked questioned about this act of war toward Mexico? Obama invoked executive privilege to protect Holder from all of these inconvenient pesky questions. That way nobody can prove that he orchestrated this in order to have an excuse to ban guns in America.

Now i'm reading stories about Obama wanting to use an executive order illegally, to ban "assault weapons," and Diane Feinstein's bill covering shotguns and pistols? Coincidence? These Democrats have no shame in what they do.

If you are a Mexican drug lord who kills American border agents, Obama will help you purchase these "assault weapons" and protect those responsible for providing them to you, but if you are a law-abiding American citizen he wants to send agents into your home to seize them.

Obama has shown time and time again, he is willing to break the law in order to accomplish his agenda. From disregarding the law by giving union pensions priority over secured creditors during the Chrysler bankruptcy, to allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the US as long as they go to school and are under 30, to ignoring a court order to stop the drilling moratorium after the BP oil spill. This man, who swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution only enforces laws that he sees fit, and creates new ones unilaterally at will.

Diane Feinstein shows that Democrats have no respect for the constitution or the 2nd amendment. As a Democrat political hack, she is trying to use the school shooting tragedy as a springboard to ban as many guns as she can. She has proposed a gun ban that is not just limited to what they call "assault weapons," but includes pistols and shotguns. Despite the fact that mass murders happen in "gun free zones", she has decided to try and make the whole country a "gun free zone." As a Democratic hack, of course she is also a hypocrite-she is a concealed carry permit holder.

So for you gun control nuts out there, why do you support these elitist politicians who have bodyguards armed with actual machine guns while they help criminals? Is it because you are good at sticking your fingers in your ears while screaming idiocy, drowning out the voice of reason, so that you can feel good about yourself while you cause more innocent people to die? Do you aspire to be a blithering idiot like Piers Morgan?

Do you like to help rapists, murderers and thugs? I don't believe that.

I do believe rank and file liberals are overgrown crybabies, who because of their fragile emotional states, have great difficulty separating how they feel from actual facts and logic, due to constant psychotic mood swings. These people are easily controlled by their leaders, who need only repeat certain phrases a couple times, point a finger at someone else, and pretend they are angry at some injustice, all the while creating more problems to "fix" the problems they created.

If they succeed in banning guns, it will directly cause more people their deaths. Democrats like Americans the way mass murderers do - defenseless.

This is a Shocking Video...

Nothing new, Obama is at it again, accusing others of doing exactly what he wants to do as we see liberals do all the time. What is shocking is who the one reporting this is. Rachel Maddow of all people? Really? What? I never thought I would agree with this lady, but she has done an unbelievable job in this segment!

NRA: To See Where Gun Licensing Leads Look to Great Britain

NRA Press Conference




The NRA did an excellent job today of responding to the idiot liberals and representing the situation accurately. I am glad they did not bend to the whims of liberal opinion. If I didn't know any better, I would have thought he stole material from my post yesterday. : )

Look at the childish liberal code pink occupiers, with their signs colored with crayons, who refuse to listen to logic. They are perfectly happy disarming people who could have stopped the shooting from happening. The "assault weapons" these idiots want to ban function the same as any semi auto rifle. One shot per trigger pull. 

But what can we expect from liberals except to be abjectly ignorant, and give stupid opinions based on no facts, like children making a scene because they want candy. We should all be glad they didn't show up in vagina costumes like they have in the past. It would be too bad if the janitor had to mop sand off the floor.

Connecticut Shooting/ Gun Ban

Of course whenever a psycho shoots people with guns, the first thing Democrats want to do is find ways to take away your protection by taking away your guns.

After the shooting in Connecticut, Obama, the man who brought us Operation Fast and Furious, which killed a federal agent, and sold guns to Mexican drug cartels, wants another assault weapons ban, like the Clinton ban in 1994. In his speech he talks about all of the gun violence that has killed innocent people, but doesn't talk about any lives that were saved in self defense. Listen to this man try and sound reasonable:





The Clinton ban banned weapons with features such as a "barrel shroud," pistol grip, retractable stock. Something that looks like this:


But this was perfectly okay:

If you didn't already know, IT'S THE SAME GUN WITH THE SAME OPERATING PARTS BUT DIFFERENT FURNITURE! Both are only semi automatic (one shot per trigger pull) and use the same bullets. But somehow the first one is an "assault weapon" but the other is not. One is supposedly making psychos go out and kill people, but apparently, if they didn't have those features on the gun, those psychos would just behave.



The proof that this gun grabbing Marxist is lying through his teeth, and he knows assault rifles are good for personal protection, is the arsenal the secret service uses to protect him. I don't know about you, but I don't have a security entourage going hours ahead of time to every place I visit ensuring that it is safe. Not to mention his security detail is equipped with fully automatic assault rifles (multiple shots per trigger pull) even when he is cruising around, not in a hostile country, but in Washington DC:


Why is it that the president, who is supposed to be our public servant, has guns protecting him that are actual fully automatic military rifles, while for our protection, he wants to prevent us from owning single shot semi auto rifles that look like the ones that protect him? Absolute Hypocrisy!

The Declaration of Independence says:

“... when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

By the time we get around to it, we are supposed to do all that with bows and arrows, while government agents are equipped with tanks, jets, and the latest and greatest weaponry funded by you and your future generation's tax dollars. What is going on in this country? Are we living in pre-WWII Germany?



Back to the situation in Connecticut. If the teachers and administrators were armed, it would not have stopped the psycho from killing, but perhaps it would have stopped him from killing so many. If some of the school administrators and teachers had guns, they could have stopped the psycho, dead. You see, that school is a "gun free zone." If "gun free zones" worked, this would never have happened. A nation-wide gun ban makes the whole country a "gun free zone." What makes anyone think it will work?

Liberals refuse to see logic. The case of gun control is no exception. Even though piles upon piles of evidence and past precedence suggests gun bans only increase crime rates, and make it less safe, they pigheadedly believe that gun bans are a good idea. Check out this video on what happens after guns were banned in Australia:




Meanwhile, while all this is happening, what is the NRA doing? Cowering like little girls, taking down their facebook page, and giveaway promotions. They will be making a speech tomorrow. If they give way, and fail to stand up for our 2nd amendment rights, on the pretense that guns are only for sporting and hunting animals, as I have heard them state time and time again, then you will know, they are only a spineless organization as useless as a RINO Republican.

The Marxist wants to use this terrible tragedy as a political stepping stone, as a means to ban "assault weapons." He is also talking about taxing ammo at ridiculous rates. Criminals don't follow gun laws! If anything, there will be more deaths if Dear Leader succeeds. Make no mistake, the next few months will be crucial, call your congressman and senators and tell them to oppose any gun bans that will be at best ineffective, and at worse, increase the crime rate! The gun grabbers are coming!!

Remember Katrina



US Soldiers go street to street confiscating guns from citizens. What 2nd amendment?

It's a Wonderful Life! (With Capitalism)

Obama "too polite" during the Debate

That's right! What we need is for him to express what he really believes, and be rude about it!

For instance Barack Obama believes...

•  Taxes need to be raised "for purposes of fairness" even if the government receives less revenue:

•  The forced seizing of wealth and redistribution by government is "neighborliness":

•  A baby born after a botched abortion should be left out to die:

As long as he admits all of these things in a rude manner, he'll win the next debate! Obviously, we all know he didn't lose the last debate because of what he's done in office, or that Mitt Romney called him out and absolutely crushed him on his policy, making him look like a fool and a hypocrite. No, not at all because of things like this:

So I urge Obama to stop being "too polite" for the next debate. He needs to be downright rude and more adamant about about what he believes in. This surely will lead to victory in not only the debate, but the upcoming election.

Do You Feel Safe?

US Embassy, Libya

US Embassy, Egypt

US Embassy, Yemen

That last video has nothing to do with any of this and doesn't show the abject ignorance of this administration toward the Middle East situation. It's not Obama's fault he supported the Arab Spring. You see, according to the media, it's Mitt Romney's fault for jumping the gun.



See, Obama had nothing to do with national security or foreign policy! He's only the president of the USA. It's Mitt Romney's fault all along! Because Barack Obama is so unquestionably qualified, we need to question if Mitt Romney is ready to be commander in chief! Can you believe the hypocrisy?

9/11 Never Forget

North Korea

Here's an older, but still informative video about North Korea.

Similarly, we can all see, we should never question our Dear Leader Barack Obama because we need to "respect the president." As liberals often express, people who disagree should be silenced. They levy ridiculous charges, everything from wanting people to suffer from dirty air and water, to racism. North Korea is truly a liberal paradise, where government can do no wrong, and the people will not criticize their government. If you are a liberal who doesn't think America, its standards of living, and freedom is acceptable, why not make a move there? Instead of trying to fundamentally transform America to suit your ideals, it would be much easier just to go where those standards already exist, wouldn't it? Look at the following satellite photo, taken at night to show lights:

Phony Environmentalists trying to reduce our "carbon footprint" should be ecstatic. They should be the first to make the move over to North Korea. With minimal waste of food, use of electricity, thriving big evil greedy capitalists and businesses, I'm sure they will find the living conditions acceptable. Why not Occupy North Korea instead of Wallstreet?

Romney Killed My Wife

This world is full of murderers! Do you know anyone who has ever laid anyone off? Has anyone related to the person laid off ever get cancer after the layoff? If so, these business owners are all murderers! Yes folks! Layoffs cause cancer! Since Obama tells us regarding business owners, "they didn't build that," I guess the government is complicit in these murders! Since Obama is the president, he is also complicit with all of these murders by extension! As a matter of fact, since Obama claims responsibility for trying to build business with various legislation, and talks about his successes, he must be the ultimate mass murderer! After all, it is inevitable that all businesses will close at some point, and people will be laid off. Think of all the deaths from cancer to come which he has set in motion by "creating jobs" at these cancer farms! He has affected more people than Romney because the government is bigger than Romney's business. As a result he has murdered thousands by giving them cancer! How can we allow this to stand? I guess since Mitt has given cancer to less people, he is the lesser of the two evils, and we have no choice but to vote him into office in November.

Operation Enduring Freedom

Chik-fil-A Appreciation Day

Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago and Mayor Thomas Menino of Boston have vowed to ban Chik-fil-A from their cities. Never underestimate a liberal's willingness to use government to punish private businesses because they disagree with their beliefs.


Today is Chik-fil-A Appreciation day. Liberals spin this event as "anti-gay," when in fact, those who show up know it is about freedom of speech and religion.

The Lamestream media hasn't reported much about it, so today I went to my local Chik-Fil-A to see if anything was actually happening. I took a picture:

Notice the cars parked on the grass and off to the sides. The drive-thru and the inside was packed.

Here's a short video:

These were taken around 2:00pm, not exactly prime lunch time. (Yes that is Limbaugh on the radio.)

For those of you who have been living under a rock for the last week, President of Chik-fil-A Dan Cathy is quoted as saying:

"I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, 'We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage,' and I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about," 

What amazes me, is that this surprises anyone. Did these people not know that founder Truett Cathy is a devout Christian? Did they not understand that Chik-fil-A is structured from the ground up as a Christian business? It's closed on Sundays for a reason! Dan Cathy makes these remarks, and suddenly this is the worst thing since Hitler's rise to power? The stench of ignorance is overwhelming.


You see, liberals will hide behind the 1st amendment when trashing public parks and defecating on police cars at occupy rallies, but if Christians express their opinions, then it's okay for government to punish and silence them.


I'd like to see Rahm, Thomas, and these other liberals try to ban Chik-fil-a for thier religious speech. The resulting lawsuits will only serve to embarrass them for being complete morons.

Breast Feeding Bloomberg Locks Up Baby Formula!

Michael Bloomberg comes out with another great idea! Does it ever end?

When we all thought that after his genius ideas about fast food, sugary drinks, smoking, salt, and guns, Genius Bloomberg could not possibly come up with any more great ideas he would like to share with the world. Starting in September, Bloomberg's plan will make baby formula available in NYC only at the hospital when signed out like medication from a doctor. That's not all! Those who want to get the formula will be subjected to a mandatory lecture about what is good for them and their babies.  Bloomberg has once again erected a wall of red tape in order to control behavior because the common people just don't have the intelligence to make good decisions for themselves.


It's called the "Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative"


Now that Bloomberg has created a program built around the idea that without a mandatory lecture, women are too ignorant to be "baby friendly," I wonder if he will promote a similar "baby friendly" lecture given to women before getting an abortion. After all, how can we count on women knowing that the baby would not be born after an abortion any more than we can count on women knowing about breastfeeding? No, Then he would be joining the Republican War on Women, and Democrats say they want government to stay away from choices about women's bodies.


Nanny Bloomberg just wants to take care of everyone! Next thing you know all NYC residents will be in mandatory straight jackets because they might accidentally fall and hurt themselves. Bland tasteless nutrient slop will be fed through a tube to each individual in order to sustain the proper nutritional balance needed for a healthy life. Don't worry about crime, commoners will be disarmed! Government agents will have the authority to walk around with guns to ensure everyone's safety in case someone gets out of their straight jacket and poses a tripping and falling hazard. What could possibly go wrong?


Question: As a leftist, how do you know when you have gone too far left?

Answer: When you have gone so far left, you piss off Whoopie Goldberg.

CBS News: Mayor Bloomberg's infant formula plan aimed at promoting breast-feeding at NYC hospitals

Genius Bloomberg Strikes Again: "...advocates who think that the right to bear arms allows you to go out and kill people at random."

We have once again been graced by the glittering ideas and thought processes of Genius Bloomberg, drawn out for us in crayon. No Salt, No Slurpees, and now No Guns. You know it's because we all cling to our guns and bibles that forces him to say these things. You see, Mayor Bloomberg is such an elite intellectual, that there is no way we can understand his brilliance. The rest of us are just knuckle-dragging troglodytes that can not control ourselves from creating the worst possible scenario when exposed to any inanimate objects including salt, drinks and guns. Of course none of us find it the least bit astounding that the great city of New York had an entire election, and could not find a single candidate more qualified for mayor. 


Thank you Genius Bloomberg, it would be so much harder for me to illustrate arrogant stateist elitism without your opinions in political discourse. To all of you reading this who believe in the 2nd amendment and own guns, let's take the day off from randomly killing people and reflect on the prismatic enlightenment provided by Brainiac Bloomberg. 

Oops how did that get there? Must be my troglodytic knuckle-dragging tendencies acting up again.

The Cost of Socialism, what the United States has to look forward to.

This post is dedicated to those supporting the Liberal Democrat Socialist Party of the United States, who embrace entitlement programs they call "safety nets," are ignorant of the way a private sector economy works, and do not know the meaning of, but frequently use, words like "suffering" and "poverty."


The average poor American has a higher standard of living than the average European. Let me show you what Liberals are trying to push us toward, and where we will end up. Please tell me more about how socialist countries are doing just fine, and we should follow their lead because they are "Progressive."

Obama doesn't like big oil. He banned drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and stopped the building of the Keystone oil pipeline from Alaska. Recently, Iran threatened again to block the Straight of Hormuz, causing oil to go back on an upward trend. If it was not for new technologies enabling the North Dakota oil boom, the cost of oil would be even higher. Rising oil costs cause every single product to go up in price, because everything needs to be transported, and the cost of transportation is included in the price. In the following video, Britain's food costs skyrocket, causing many to starve and resort to food banks:

In Obama's "Affordable" Healthcare Act the Independent Payment Advisory Board will be in charge of rationing. Obamacare: The right to healthcare insurance, but no right to treatment. How would you like a bureaucrat deciding whether you are important enough to receive medical treatment? A British National Health Service bureaucrat talks about keeping decisions between patients and doctors, then defends rationing of care by zip code: 

The US has a $16 Trillion debt, and spends every penny of what they receive in Social Security tax it does not pay out each year. Entitlement spending like foodstamps, Social Security, Medicare, and now Obamacare dwarfs anything else in our country's spending. When the mindset of entitlement sets in, the use of national debt as a funding mechanism is exhausted, and politicians have no choice but to reign it all in, this is what happens: The Greek austerity riots.

The Fed is looking into more "quantitative easing" today. All this means is they are going to print more money hoping it will somehow spur economic growth. Fed Chief Ben Bernake is an idiot. The more money that is printed, the less it is worth, and this only accomplishes the goal of taking buying power out of your pocket and placing into the hands of the government. The issue today is not that there isn't enough paper money, it's that in this economic climate and the uncertainty that comes from Obamacare, businesses are afraid of spending their cash. Printing will  not cause people to spend their money, it will only make money worthless. Here's a video on the Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe:

Liberals have no new ideas. All of their "Progressive" ideas have been tried, and they have failed. Using the word "Progressive" to describe Liberals is an oxymoron, as they continue to spout ideas from yesteryear pretending they are "new" and "modern." Here's news: The laws of economics haven't changed.




Youtube: More rioting and looting in Greece

Female Android Sex Toy in Japan

Leave it to liberals to make the female figure into nothing more than a sex toy, while defending the feminist movement.